Re: [squid-users] performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?

On 19/03/11 04:32, Alex Crow wrote:
>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Which directive of these should be just "cache" in 3.1?
>>
>> The one which used to be called "no_cache" back in Squid-2.2.
>>
>> Amos
>
> So
>
> cache deny all
>
> is the same as
>
> no_cache deny all?

Yes. They are identical, except that recently Squid will throw warnings
at you for using the obsolete name no_cache.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.11
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.5