Re: [squid-users] performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?

From: Alex Crow <alex_at_nanogherkin.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:32:25 +0000

>> Hi,
>>
>> Which directive of these should be just "cache" in 3.1?
>
> The one which used to be called "no_cache" back in Squid-2.2.
>
> Amos

cache deny all

is the same as

no_cache deny all?

Alex
Received on Fri Mar 18 2011 - 15:32:30 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Go Wow: "Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid 3.1 and winbind 3.4.7 permissions issue on winbindd_privileged"
Previous message: Go Wow: "Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid 3.1 and winbind 3.4.7 permissions issue on winbindd_privileged"
In reply to: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [squid-users] performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?"
Next in thread: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [squid-users] performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?"
Reply: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [squid-users] performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 19 2011 - 12:00:01 MDT