Hi Serge,
        I am not sure why you think that most of CACHE_DIGEST_HIT are false
hits. The tables you have posted do not contain explicit information about
false hits as far as I can tell. Does Calamaris support CACHE_DIGEST tags?
Please explain what makes you think that the number of false hits is too
large. 
Thanks,
Alex.
On Tue, 18 Aug 1998, Serge Krashakov wrote:
> Accidently, I have found that the most of CACHE_DIGEST_HIT are false hits.
> For example, yesterday daily statistics for HTTP requests from the first
> cache-server is:
> 
> # Outgoing requests by destination
> neighbor type                      request     %   kByte        %   sec  kB/sec 
> ....
> second-cache                          3126   2.66      8328   0.87    0    0.24 
>  CACHE_DIGEST_HIT                     3053   2.60      7838   0.82    0    0.23 
>  SIBLING_HIT                            73   0.06       490   0.05    0    0.50 
> 
> Meanwile, calamaris report from second-cache for HTTP-requests from the first
> cache says:
> 
> # Incoming TCP-requests by status
> status                             request     %    kByte       %   sec  kB/sec 
> --------------------------------- -------- ------ --------- ------ ---- ------- 
> HIT                                   1143  36.33      2250  20.35    0    4.98 
>  TCP_IMS_HIT                           894  28.42       249   2.25    0   11.80 
>  TCP_HIT                               218   6.93      1918  17.35    2    4.47 
>  TCP_MEM_HIT                            22   0.70        62   0.56    0  307.15 
>  TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT                        5   0.16         2   0.02    0   65.76 
>  TCP_REFRESH_HIT                         4   0.13        19   0.17    0   14.69 
> MISS                                  1976  62.81      6355  57.48   20    0.16 
>  TCP_MISS                             1976  62.81      6355  57.48   20    0.16 
> ERROR                                   27   0.86      2452  22.17    1  136.36 
>  TCP_IMS_MISS                           27   0.86      2452  22.17    1  136.36 
> --------------------------------- -------- ------ --------- ------ ---- ------- 
> Sum                                   3146            11056          13    0.28 
> 
> # Requested content-type
> content-type                             request     %    kByte       %   hit-% 
> --------------------------------------- -------- ------ --------- ------ ------ 
> ......
> application/cache-digest                      30   0.95      2707  24.48  16.67 
> --------------------------------------- -------- ------ --------- ------ ------ 
> Sum                                         3146 100.00     11056 100.00  36.33 
> 
> 
> My questions are:
> 
> 1. Why the are so many false hits? Is there any way to improve
> using cache digest?
> 
> 2. Is it possible to control cache_digest hit and miss using Cache Manager?
> (Peer Selection menu seems doesn't work)
> 
> Serge Krashakov
> 
Received on Tue Aug 18 1998 - 09:51:26 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:41:38 MST