Re: Adding SCTP support

I know, I know. I even had a quick chat with Randall Stewart about this
at BSDCAN, who is one of the driving forces behind all of this SCTP stuff.

SCTP is a great idea. Fleshing out a draft spec for how to have it live
along-side HTTP/TCP? Even better. :)

On Sun, Jun 01, 2008, Matt Benjamin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> This is true. There are some neat ideas (and apparently firefox
> patches) in
>
> http://www2006.org/programme/files/xhtml/2035/2035-natarajan-xhtml/2035-natarajan-xhtml.html
>
> The most compelling reason to use SCTP for HTTP delivery would seem to
> be the potential to improve throughput via SCTP multi-streaming.
>
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | I've spoken to some SCTP related people about this before.
> | The trouble is:
> |
> | * NOone's fleshed out how HTTP over SCTP should look;
> | * Noone's fleshed out how servers should choose HTTP over TCP vs SCTP.
> |
> | They're the much more pressing questions.
> |
> |
> |
> | Adrian
>
>
> - --
>
> Matt Benjamin
>
> The Linux Box
> 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
> Ann Arbor, MI 48104
>
> http://linuxbox.com
>
> tel. 734-761-4689
> fax. 734-769-8938
> cel. 734-216-5309
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFIQrWTJiSUUSaRdSURCIAPAJkBWRGOfrIN/eIc7+wcCWkxTHBYMgCfTj7+
> K2AlxaPdb6+W/HMIPDWjkzE=
> =Kh3i
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
- $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -