Re: Adding SCTP support

From: Matt Benjamin <matt_at_linuxbox.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:43:32 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

This is true. There are some neat ideas (and apparently firefox
patches) in

http://www2006.org/programme/files/xhtml/2035/2035-natarajan-xhtml/2035-natarajan-xhtml.html

The most compelling reason to use SCTP for HTTP delivery would seem to
be the potential to improve throughput via SCTP multi-streaming.

Adrian Chadd wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I've spoken to some SCTP related people about this before.
| The trouble is:
|
| * NOone's fleshed out how HTTP over SCTP should look;
| * Noone's fleshed out how servers should choose HTTP over TCP vs SCTP.
|
| They're the much more pressing questions.
|
|
|
| Adrian

- --

Matt Benjamin

The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIQrWTJiSUUSaRdSURCIAPAJkBWRGOfrIN/eIc7+wcCWkxTHBYMgCfTj7+
K2AlxaPdb6+W/HMIPDWjkzE=
=Kh3i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sun Jun 01 2008 - 14:44:45 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT