Re: Dynamic content policy update

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:42:01 +0900

I'm for it. Henrik suggested just "." (ie, everything) rather than
specifically doing cgi-bin and ? URLs; is there any particular reason
to have different "." vs "(cgi-bin|\?)" refresh pattern lines?

Thanks,

Adrian

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Any objections to Squid2-HEAD and Squid 3-HEAD getting the caching
> policy adjustment for dynamic pages Adrian proposed before xmas?
>
> Namely Dropping the
> acl QUERY cgi-bin \?
> cache deny QUERY
>
> Replacing it with:
> refresh_pattern (cgi-bin|\?) 0 0% 0
>
>
> No terrible side-effects here so far after a month of use. Just the
> bugzilla Expires bug coming to view and being fixed.
>
> Amos
> --
> Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
> There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
- $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -
Received on Mon Jan 28 2008 - 20:31:05 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jan 30 2008 - 12:00:09 MST