Hi Henrik,
> Now committed to 2.5 as there was no objections, and I consider this a
> major flaw of Squid.
Thanks for fixing this, I added it to the last debian packages reverting
my old patch for >2GB support.
Apparently the aufs+2GB patches caused some problems with diskd, can you
please take a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302634
which reports failure with
assertion failed: stmem.c:93: "current_offset == target_offset"
and a dirty cache restart.
The packages is plain 2.5.STABLE9 with these patches:
squid-2.5.STABLE9-setcookie.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-ftp_EPLF.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-ftp_base_href.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-aufs.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-aufs_shutdown.patch
squid-2.5.STABLE9-2GB.patch
There's also a small typo in the changelog for the 2GB patch. The actual
option that enables largefiles support is --with-large-files instead of
--enable-large-files
Regards,
-- Luigi Gangitano -- <luigi@debian.org> -- <gangitano@lugroma3.org> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun May 01 2005 - 12:00:06 MDT