Ok i fear to waste many time to understand that, but it could be interesting ^^
Thanks for your replies !
2014-05-15 15:10 GMT-04:00 Alex Crow <alex_at_nanogherkin.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Welcome to the practically incomprehensible world of QoS on Linux - look up
> "LARTC" and then feel the fear!
>
> It's really powerful but even after 14 years of managing Linux gateways I
> still prefer you just use shorewall to take away the complexity - and you
> are welcome to call me lazy ;-)
>
> Alex
>
>
> On 15/05/14 20:04, Antoine Klein wrote:
>>
>> Ok thanks, it could be a good idea !
>>
>> Do you know if we can apply a QoS with the bucket concept of delay
>> pool using the Linux QoS Tools ?
>>
>> 2014-05-15 14:41 GMT-04:00 Leonardo Rodrigues <leolistas_at_solutti.com.br>:
>>>
>>> Em 15/05/14 14:59, Antoine Klein escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> I need to install squid to apply a QoS in a private network with the
>>>> delay
>>>> pool.
>>>> In fact, this network offer a public WIFI, so that's not possible to
>>>> configure a proxy on clients.
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to intercept HTTPS connexion, apply a Delay Pool and
>>>> forward the request without decipher the SSL packet ?
>>>>
>>> I really dont think that's possible. Anyway, you can always use your
>>> Linux (or whatever OS you're using) QoS tools to acchieve something
>>> similar
>>> to delay pools but on NATted connections. You can have squid intercepting
>>> TCP/80 connections and apply delay pools, the TCP/443 (and all other
>>> indeed)
>>> connections can be throttled by QoS SO tools.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
>>> Leonardo Rodrigues
>>> Solutti Tecnologia
>>> http://www.solutti.com.br
>>>
>>> Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
>>> gertrudes_at_solutti.com.br
>>> My SPAMTRAP, do not email it
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-- Antoine KLEINReceived on Fri May 16 2014 - 13:03:09 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 16 2014 - 12:00:05 MDT