Re: Fwd: [squid-users] Performance tuning of SMP + Large rock

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Dr.x <ahmed.zaeem_at_netstream.ps> wrote:
> @Rajiv Desai
>
> have u found increasing in bandwidth saving when u used large rock ??

Yes. Large rock works pretty well with multiple SMP workers (in my
limited experience for past 5 days).
I get 85% hit rate for previously read (and thereby cached) dataset.
I will be looking into why there are 15% misses coz theoretically hit
rate should be 100% for this test.

> if so
> how much difference u found ?

Difference as compared to what? I believe rock store is the only SMP
aware cache as stated in documentation.
I did try with aufs initially but the hit rate was very poor as
expected due to multiple workers.

>
> regards
>
>
>
> -----
> Dr.x
> --
> View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Performance-tuning-of-SMP-Large-rock-tp4664765p4664851.html
> Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Sun Feb 16 2014 - 21:18:36 MST