On 6/9/2013 9:30 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 06/09/2013 10:34 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
>
>> And yes, improve Squid to have no service disruption during a reconfigure
>> will be a great feature.
>> Are you aiming at "minimise service disruption window" or go for
>> "never disrupt service" (unless a very important parameter like port
>> number changes).
>
> Factory is not working on this at the moment, but if we were, I would
> aim for "no disruption" (including port number changes -- there is
> nothing special about that part of the configuration).
>
> Alex.
>
OK good to know.
The aim is not on actual work but rather knowing what we going to think
of in the very far future.
Eliezer
Received on Sun Jun 09 2013 - 18:37:43 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 10 2013 - 12:00:11 MDT