Il 09/04/2013 19:33, Mr Dash Four ha scritto:
> [snip]
>if the maximum_object_size_in_memory is reduced,
> then I suppose squid's memory footprint will have to go down too, which
> makes the cache_mem option a bit useless.
>I think will just store more objects in RAM. <
Agreed.
But it should also depend upon
# reply_body_max_size 0
#read_ahead_gap
Setting reply_body_max_size 100 MB
should create some safety net.
-- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/high-memory-usage-squid-3-2-0-tp4659422p4659441.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.Received on Wed Apr 10 2013 - 08:05:10 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 10 2013 - 12:00:05 MDT