On 2/04/2013 10:46 p.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 02.04.2013 14:30, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> No, unfortuately nobody is working on that part yet.
>>
>> As a workaround you should be able to retrieve SNMP information
>> per-worker by using ${process_number} in the snmp_port directive to
>> assign each worker a unique port for SNMP contact.
>>
>>
> Is it worth reporting in the bugzilla ? (Or maby this is a well known
> planned to fix issue and the report will just add unnecessary escalation ?)
> For example I can live for now with one worker, even on my most crowded
> productions.
>
> Thanks.
> Eugene.
We are tracking it on the http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale
feature page.
I see now that apparently there is something underway - but no mention
of it specifically what that is has come through squid-dev yet IIRC.
Amos
Received on Tue Apr 02 2013 - 13:58:30 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 02 2013 - 12:00:04 MDT