Re: [squid-users] Basic question on refresh_pattern

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:51:18 +1300

On 26/03/2013 12:15 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 12:16 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>> Since all URLs are one or more bytes long it always matches, ie "any
>> URL".
>>
>> But don't confuse that for meaning the pattern applies on *all* URLs.
>> It only matches when refresh_pattern is applied and only if no
>> earlier pattern matched the URL.
>>
>> Amos
> it's the most basic rule that should exist right?
>
> Eliezer

Yes. The behaviour when there are no refresh_pattern is unknown to me,
but probably not good.

Amos
Received on Mon Mar 25 2013 - 11:51:26 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 25 2013 - 12:00:06 MDT