Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE9 'zph_sibling' seemingly not tagging traffic

On 12/02/2013 10:31 p.m., Nick Fennell wrote:
> Hey Amos.
>
> I was waiting for that!
>
> We have a few requirements not yet satisfied in Squid 3.x, storeurl_rewrite features are a big one, so we're having to hold off until we're able to conjure something up.
>
> Can't get them ported across can you? ;-)

That feature is already ported into 3.HEAD thanks to Eliezer. You can
make use of it by building that development package. As things stand
today it will be in 3.4 series. There is a bit of work and a lot of
testing required to get it into 3.3, but if anyone is interested in
helping out with that let me know. Eliezer has decided to concentrate on
some needed further improvements now rather than back-ports.

> WIth regard to 2.7, ZPH, are you aware of any bugs that may cause sibling_hit to be ineffective. I saw on the Lusca project that their code had an issue preventing the mark from ever being applied. I wonder if Squid suffers with a similar fault.

I'm not aware of any bugs in the ZPH patch. They (ZPH) wrote two very
different versions of the feature for 2.7 and 3.x, and we have extended
and fixed the 3.x version in quite a few ways since it was merged. A lot
of the "bugs" people have reported are either in code which was never
setting TOS at all, or where they confused the up/down directionality of
the packet flow. As for Lusca vs 2.7, yes being a fork of that version
it is likely that Lusca contains any bug known in 2.7.

Amos
Received on Tue Feb 12 2013 - 10:08:59 MST