Re: [squid-users] Re: transparent (intercepting?) without wccp, options?

From: Ming-Ching Tiew <mctiew_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:10:21 -0700 (PDT)

--- On Fri, 7/6/12, Ezequiel Birman <stormwatch_at_espiga4.com.ar> wrote:

>
> In http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4#Routing_configuration
> I
> see rules applied to eth0, should i rewrite br0 in place of
> eth0?
>
>

I think it should rather be lo.

I did not follow the rp_filter thingie strictly. I set all of them zero.
Received on Fri Jul 06 2012 - 03:10:28 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [squid-users] Cache API"
Previous message: Ezequiel Birman: "[squid-users] Re: transparent (intercepting?) without wccp, options?"
In reply to: Ezequiel Birman: "[squid-users] Re: transparent (intercepting?) without wccp, options?"
Next in thread: Eliezer Croitoru: "Re: [squid-users] Re: transparent (intercepting?) without wccp, options?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 06 2012 - 12:00:01 MDT