[squid-users] squid vs apache with large files?

From: Chris Fulton <cfulton_at_ffn.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 17:17:33 -0700

It seems that squid is significantly slower than apache in serving large files. Is this to be expected?

[cfulton@a (17:51:54) ~/test]$ wget http://www.test.com/static/m1.zip
--2012-04-30 17:51:55-- http://www.test.com/static/m1.zip
Resolving www.test.com... 172.16.9.22
Connecting to www.test.com|172.16.9.22|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 26702767 (25M) [application/zip]
Saving to: ām1.zipā

100%[==================================================================================================================================================================>] 26,702,767 4.14M/s in 6.1s

2012-04-30 17:52:02 (4.17 MB/s) - ām1.zipā

[cfulton@a (17:52:02) ~/test]$ wget http://www.test.com:8080/static/m1.zip
--2012-04-30 17:52:09-- http://www.test.com:8080/static/m1.zip
Resolving www.test.com... 172.16.9.22
Connecting to www.test.com|172.16.9.22|:8080... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 26702767 (25M) [application/zip]
Saving to: ām1.zip.1ā

100%[==================================================================================================================================================================>] 26,702,767 72.0M/s in 0.4s

2012-04-30 17:52:10 (72.0 MB/s) - ām1.zip.1ā

IMPORTANT: This email message is intended only for the use of the individual to whom, or entity to which, it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are NOT the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender immediately and permanently delete this email. Thank you.
Received on Wed May 02 2012 - 00:17:43 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 02 2012 - 12:00:03 MDT