[squid-users] Re: Metrics to calculate 'best' values for cache_mem and cache_dir?

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:16:48 +1300

On 28.03.2012 13:51, Linda W wrote:
> Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> On 28.03.2012 08:37, babajaga wrote:
>>>> I've read (for Linux at least) aufs is superior to diskd,<
>>>
>>> I have my doubts. First of all, it might depend upon the version of
>>> Squid
>>> you want to use.
>>> I use 2.7, and, looking at the source code for aufs, ony reads are
>>> async.
>>> Having some discussion with Amos already regarding this issue, he
>>> stated,
>>> that async writes were not enabled because being "unstable".
>
> ----
> ????
>
> Amos? writes are unstable on linux? Is this a squid specific
> problem?

I don't recall having mentioned I/O stability in relation to this
behaviour. They are async on Linux and blocking on BSD.

Amos
Received on Wed Mar 28 2012 - 03:16:51 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Mar 28 2012 - 12:00:04 MDT