Re: [squid-users] Caching in 3.2 vs 3.1

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 01:33:40 +1300

On 22/03/2012 12:58 a.m., Erik Svensson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run the test again with debug_options set as Amos recommended.

Thank you. That confirmed there is something very funky going on. No
timstamp, caching controls or cross-worker limits going on there. It
really should be caching.

Amos
Received on Fri Mar 23 2012 - 12:33:46 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid Compile Errors"
Previous message: Marcus Kool: "Re: [squid-users] Squid - Content Filter"
In reply to: Erik Svensson: "Re: [squid-users] Caching in 3.2 vs 3.1"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 23 2012 - 12:00:04 MDT