Re: [squid-users] requests per second

On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> On 12.03.2012 01:13, Student University wrote:
>> Dears ,
>>
>> how we can achieve 5000 RPS through squid ,,,,
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> Liley
>
>
> Why are you asking?

Or another question, what is the RPS that you are getting now? Then we can
look and see where the bottlenecks are and what can be done to increase
the numbers.

David Lang

>
> Amos
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> On 9/03/2012 4:52 a.m., Student University wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi ,
>>>> This is Liley ,,,
>>>>
>>>> can anyone tell me what
>>>> requests per second can squid3 serves ,
>>>> especially if we run it on the top of a hardware with OCZ RevoDrive 3
>>>> X2 (200,000 Random Write 4K IOPS)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance .
>>>
>>>
>>> These are some performance stats from network admin who have been willing
>>> to
>>> donate the info publicly:
>>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks
>>>
>>> As for the OCZ question, Squid has been known to burn through SSDs a lot
>>> faster than manufacturer claims of their lifetime. Squid traffic is
>>> mostly-write with >50Mbps write peak rates where SSD are manufactured for
>>> mostly-read I/O patterns. I've recently been told of one ISP reaching
>>> around
>>> 100Mbps writes on average with no trouble at all.
>>>
>>> The OCZ is rated well above that, so is unlikely to be a visible
>>> bottleneck.
>>> You are more likely to be throttled by the speed Squid can parse new
>>> requests. Which is CPU bound.
>>>
>>> Amos
>>>
>
>
Received on Mon Mar 12 2012 - 03:06:21 MDT