I'm doing it... First removing 10394. I'll post the results after test.
Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 17/01/2012 3:00 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 17/01/2012 2:43 a.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>>> Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>>> On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I had this too. But with a 3.1.18 in a production server (under
>>>>> solaris).
>>>>
>>>> Sure that was 3.1.18? that could narrow the diagnosis down a lot if its
>>>> true.
>>>
>>> Yes. It's on a 3.1.18 on a Solaris box.
>>>
>>> Tell me if I can make something to help.
>>
>> 3.1 narrows it down to probably just these two patches:
>> www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/squid-3.1-10394.patch
>> www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/squid-3.1-10403.patch
>>
>> The top one being more likely. If you are able to patch and test with
>> those separately, and see if it disappears (or not) it would help.
>>
>> Amos
>
> I mean reverse the patch (patch -R -p0 < squid-3.1-10xx.patch) and test
> with them absent of course.
>
> Amos
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Jose Marcio MARTINS DA CRUZ http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr Ecole des Mines de Paris 60, bd Saint Michel 75272 - PARIS CEDEX 06 mailto:Jose-Marcio.Martins_at_mines-paristech.frReceived on Mon Jan 16 2012 - 14:39:00 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jan 16 2012 - 12:00:03 MST