On 27/10/11 18:07, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:28:49PM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm still very suspicious that it is making use of HTTP/1.1 features
>>> badly. The difference between 2.x and 3.1 is that 2.x advertise HTTP/1.0
>>> to the server and passes the result back as HTTP/1.0 to the browser. But
>>> 3.1 advertises HTTP/1.1 abilities to the server and passes it back to
>>> the client browser with HTTP/1.0, most features are passed straight
>>> through, but some are down-mapped to HTTP/1.0 (chunked encoding and
>>> 100-continue responses are stripped).
>>>
>>
>
> Sorry, just another relevant point, the squid 3.1.15 machines don't have
> direct access to the internet, they are using a squid 2.7 stable 6 as a
> parent proxy - so, if I understand things correctly, http/1.1 features
> shouldn't be being seen by the external site?
>
Aha. Yes, correct.
Which only leaves the DNS thing.
I get these results:
time host -t AAAA www.my.commbank.com.au
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
real 0m14.276s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
time host -t A www.my.commbank.com.au
www.my.commbank.com.au has address 140.168.70.21
real 0m0.034s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.020s
Squid-3.1 has 30-60 second DNS lookup timeout.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.16 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.13Received on Thu Oct 27 2011 - 05:25:34 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 27 2011 - 12:00:08 MDT