Re: [squid-users] cache_peer allow-miss

On 29/07/11 21:03, senthil kumar wrote:
> Thanks for the reply
>
> We are using squid2.7 stable9
>
> Consider squid2 has two siblings squid3 and squid4
>
> cache_peer squid3 sibling 80 3130 allow-miss
> cache_peer squid4 sibling 80 3130 allow-miss
>
> In this case when request comes to squid2 from squid1 and content was
> not to be in squid3 and squid4
> Whether squid forwards request to peer which replied first ICP_MISS
> or both peers?

I think fastest to respond. I don't know 2.7 that well though.
*regardless* of a MISS.

squid4 might have it but squid3 respond fastest and gets used. I don't
know for sure.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.14
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.10