Thanks for the support.
On 24 July 2011 15:34, Markus Moeller <huaraz_at_moeller.plus.com> wrote:
>
> Yes it is safe to ignore the rc=102 error.
>
> Markus
>
> "Syed Hussaini" <gowows_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:CAGj7Xbnec8juqsTKySKMKk4L+FhVWYhx+Nb0hmtNOhtf=q9G9A_at_mail.gmail.com...
> yeah Markus I even thought its becuz of that -d option.
>
> Is it completely safe to ignore this.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
> On 21 July 2011 23:26, Markus Moeller <huaraz_at_moeller.plus.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Syed,
>>
>> -d option is for debug output.
>>
>> The message
>>
>> squid_kerb_auth: parseNegTokenInit failed with rc=102 comes from old
>> modules
>> which use check first for a gssapi token and then for an spngeo token.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Markus
>>
>>
>> "Syed Hussaini" <gowows_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:CAGj7XbmB5eZTsuWgd9Q9AkE9UeKgG5YV=t0tQ7udsa3ejn+oxA_at_mail.gmail.com...
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using squid version - 2.7 Stable9. My Kerberos authentication is
>>> working good as well. I'm receiving this info in my cache.log and just
>>> want to confirm that its not worry some.
>>>
>>> squid_kerb_auth: parseNegTokenInit failed with rc=102
>>> 2011/07/21 10:54:50| squid_kerb_auth: AF
>>>
>>>
>>> oYGgMIGdoAMKAQChCwYJKoZIgvcSAQICooGIBIGFYIGCBgkqhkiG9xIBAgICAG9zMHGgAwIBBaEDAgEPomUwY6ADAgEXolwEWobQXIUTVLEfPspj7ZpRThBLZzVgpamXrYmsjvHrxTIgQUWJ8eH1fQESDD2Zn4hsH2uNucFM2u4aJW10mIZTmLkwcNn0Ufj+QsdeP6XsPtqw7HZDZy4v/vV3lA==
>>> kite.k_at_REDGROUP.COM
>>>
>>> I get this info for all users who access squid. If someone is using
>>> IE 6 then this log doesnt comes up.
>>>
>>> I have passed -s -d options to squid_kerb_auth in squid.conf, is it
>>> becuz of this that I receive above info?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help, as always you guys are great helping us.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jul 25 2011 - 07:20:08 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 26 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT