Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid 3.2.0.9 problems and special reverse proxy configuration

On 15/07/11 02:38, niemidc wrote:
> Thanks for the tips!
>
> Was my cache_peer line OK?
>

Yes. Though with only one round-robin wont do anything than change the
log tag. I assumed you have several.

> The possibility of hitting an item from a different port could be
> disastrous, however. Are they identified by both host and URI, or if the
> URI is the same (say, both /index.html) could you get the wrong one? If
> this cannot be fixed through configuration, we might have to have hundreds
> of instances of squid to keep things truly separate, but that would be a
> huge pain in the neck to manage.

They are stored on the full absolute URL. Another reason keeping the
/serv1 part end-to-end is useful.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.14
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.9