Re: [squid-users] A way/hack to force squid to die?

2011/6/14 Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
> On 14/06/11 18:42, Tom Tux wrote:
>>
>> 2011/6/10 Amos Jeffries<squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
>>>
>>> On 10/06/11 20:41, Tom Tux wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mmm...
>>>>
>>>> Now I were able to force squid to die (with gdb):
>>>>
>>>>  From cache.log:
>>>> --- SNIP ---
>>>> (squid)(death+0x37)[0x564d37]
>>>> /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xf5d0)[0x7f99ebe705d0]
>>>> FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying.
>>>> 2011/06/10 10:37:28.408| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting...
>>>> 2011/06/10 10:37:28.409| assertion failed: comm.cc:301: "data ==
>>>> COMMIO_FD_READCB(fd)"
>>>> --- SNAP ---
>>>>
>>>> But there is no mail sent to the mailaddress defined on the
>>>> "cache_mgr"-directive. I made also a tcpdump on port 25 to check, if
>>>> there even a mail is sent. But no packets on port 25, no mail.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm,
>>>  - check for a file /tmp/squid-XXXXXX
>>
>> This file is not existing. I searched the whole system for files like
>> "squid-*", no usefull returns.
>>
>>>  - check that the command line:
>>>   "$mail_program $cache_mgr</tmp/squid-XXXXXX"
>>>  works as per the mail_program directive requirements.
>>
>> This is working well. "mail_program" is set to "mail". And the command
>> "mail test_at_example.com</etc/group" is working well.
>>
>>>  - check that your mail system accepts email from squid@$unique_hostname
>>> and
>>> squid@$visible_hostname
>>
>> Our mail system is accepting mails from squid in several ways
>> (squid_at_squidbox, squid_at_squidbox.example.com...).
>>>
>>>  ** Email spam filters is one of several reasons why hostname must be a
>>> FQDN
>>> with working rDNS.
>>
>> This does not affect mails sending by our squid.
>
> success then?
No. Squid dies as expected, but sends no mail.

I did again a tcpdump on port 25. But there's no traffic. Switching to
the linux-user "squid" and sending then mails is successful, I'm using
3.1.9.

Regards,
Tom

>
> Amos
> --
> Please be using
>  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12
>  Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.8 and 3.1.12.2
>
Received on Tue Jun 14 2011 - 08:24:37 MDT