2011/5/4 Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
> On Wed, 4 May 2011 12:38:43 -0400, Carlos Manuel Trepeu Pupo wrote:
>>
>> 2011/5/4 Amos Jeffries:
>>>
>>> On 05/05/11 03:35, Carlos Manuel Trepeu Pupo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I tried in previous post to change the established connection when the
>>>> time of the delay_pool change. Amos give me 3 solution and now I'm
>>>> trying with QoS, but I have this idea:
>>>>
>>>> If I have 2, 3 or the count of squid.conf that I could need, and with
>>>> one script I make squid3 -k reconfigure. That not finish any active
>>>> connection and apply the changes, what do you think?
>>>
>>> It is favoured by some. Has the slight side effect of "forgetting" the
>>> delay
>>> pool assigned on older Squid versions.
>>
>> What do you mean about "forget" the delay_pool?
>
> The reconfigure erases old delay pools config and re-creates it.
> As I recall the old code used to leave it at that, with the existing
> connections having no delay pool config set. That got fixed a year or two
> ago to re-calculate all existing requests delay pools after a configure.
> They may get a freshly filled pool suddenly, but stay limited overall.
Please, can you explain me better ?. My english played me a bad play
and I can't understand at all. Thanks
>
>>>>
>>>> Remember that I have Ubuntu 10.04 with Squid 3 STABLE1. This night
>>>
>>> 10.04 and "3.0.STABLE1"? dude!
>>
>> lol I'm now deploying Debian 6, but I don't want to install squid
>> until I solved my problems.
>>
>>>
>>>> when my users gone I gonna try !! Tomorrow I tell you, but if someone
>>>> tried this, please, send the result, so i can use my time in QoS.
>>>
>>
>> Now I just tried the -k reconfigure, but something strange happen, so
>> I backup my squid.conf and in the new one I just put this delay_pool:
>> delay_pools 1
>> delay_class 1 1
>> delay_parameters 1 10240/10240
>> delay_access 1 allow all
>>
>> With this parameters the speed shouldn't be more than 10 KB, but I can
>> see in my firewall the proxy reaches speeds until 32 KB, I guess there
>> are just peaks, but if I have 100 clients, and all them make these
>> peaks, then my DSL will be saturated.
>
> I'd put that down to STABLE1. Try again with the newer version in Deb 6.
>
> Amos
>
>
Received on Mon May 09 2011 - 16:50:44 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 09 2011 - 12:00:02 MDT