On 18/04/2011 04:14, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:57:11 +0300, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>> On 17/04/2011 19:44, Jenny Lee wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Sorry for not answering. There was just had nothing I could be sure
>>>> about until now...
>>>>
>>>> 3.2.0.7 will be out early (and very soon) with fixes for the critical
>>>> and blocker bugs currently known to exist in 3.2.0.6 tarballs. The
>>>> fixes
>>>> are now in 3.HEAD awaiting some maintenance and any testing you
>>>> care to
>>>> throw at them.
>>> Thanks Amos.
>>>
>>> We will be waiting 3.2.0.7.
>>>
>>> Release cycle seem to be 1.5 months between 3.2.0's.
>>>
>>> When you say earlier, what would be the upper end of the timeframe?
>>> (1 week, 1 month?)
>>>
>>> I know you have your plans and schedules but I would appreciate if
>>> we get a ballpark estimate so we do not waste time on 3.2.0.6 or
>>> 3.HEAD and plan on 3.2.0.7. We have held off 3.2.0.6 that we wanted
>>> to upgrade so long now.
>>>
>>> I can respectfully understand if you do not want to answer this
>>> stupid question :)
>>>
>>> Jenny Thank Amos and all the team.
>> what testing re we talking about the 3.HEAD version?
>> I will be happy to start testings
>>
>> Eliezer
>
>
> Anything and everything you can think of to throw at it. Looking
> primarily for any problems real-world people will face, then for edge
> case problems the odd person might encounter.
>
> Amos
>
I will start in a week or two the testings.
Eliezer
Received on Mon Apr 18 2011 - 12:00:44 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 18 2011 - 12:00:03 MDT