Re: [squid-users] Re: squid 3.2.0.5 even slower than squid 3.1 and doesn't work with workers >1

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, david_at_lang.hm wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, david_at_lang.hm wrote:
>
>> resending without the attachments since this doesn't appear to have gotten
>> through to the list. if this gets through I'll reply with them.
>
> ok, apparently the list doesn't like attachments

it also has a size restriction low enough that the logs exceed it.

I'll try with them as zipped attachments and see if that goes through.

if not, please let me know who to send them to for more information.

David Lang
Received on Tue Mar 22 2011 - 00:16:09 MDT