> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:59:56 -0500, david robertson wrote:
>>> I'm in the process of writing a script to give me some cache hit
>>> statistics for my cluster. There's some confusion on the cache_object
>>> info output, though. For example, this particular host only caches to
>>> memory, however this is the output I get:
>>>
>>> Request Hit Ratios: 5min: 40.0%, 60min: 39.2%
>>> Request Memory Hit Ratios: 5min: 69.7%, 60min: 69.6%
>>>
>>> For a host that's only caching to memory, there's a pretty large
>>> discrepancy between the two listed above. What's the difference
>>> between the two above?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Squid version? and how did you make it "memory only"?
>>
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:32:57 -0500, david robertson wrote:
> Sorry:
> Squid Cache: Version 2.7.STABLE9-20101104
>
> The frontend servers only cache to memory, via
> cache_dir null /dev/null
>
Okay. Thats correct, so its possibly a bug of some sort then.
Amos
Received on Wed Nov 10 2010 - 03:06:13 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Nov 10 2010 - 12:00:03 MST