Re: Fwd: Re: [squid-users] Re: Bandwidth split?

So, at present, my #3 pool is only allowing 64kbps for the entire server?
That doesn;t seem right as using iftop on the server reports that the
current speed is 2.22Mb and reached a peak of 5.25Mb total (in/out)
Why use a class 3 at all in most server cases? I suppose you might want to
restrict proxy server usage to a percentage.
I would like the server to be unlimited but each user using it should only
get say 1Mb max, maybe less.
So, can I forget the class 3 completely?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Chad Naugle" <Chad.Naugle_at_travimp.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:16 PM
To: "J Webster" <webster_jack_at_hotmail.com>; <squid-users_at_squid-cache.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [squid-users] Re: Bandwidth split?

> Remember, the #3 pool here, should represent the TOTAL allowed rate for
> the Squid Proxy, for all users in 1 bucket. If you want to limit
> individual users' bandwidth, use at least a Class 2, or Class 3 pool.
>
> In my trial & error testing, 64000 does not directly equate to 64k/sec
> in actual throughput. You need to tweak the settings to fit your
> situation, until you get desirable results.
>
> Here is my example to get up to 150-300k/sec thruput per a userid,
> notice I used a Class 4 pool due to eDirectory IP -> User mappings, and
> deny access to the pool outside of normal business hours, and "Level1"
> employee's.
>
> # Delay Pools
> delay_pools 1
> delay_class 1 4
> delay_access 1 deny allowed_src
> delay_access 1 deny edir_root_level1
> delay_access 1 deny edir_beth_level1
> delay_access 1 deny edir_far_level1
> delay_access 1 deny edir_mel_level1
> delay_access 1 deny edir_riv_level1
> delay_access 1 deny !biz_hours_norm !biz_hours_wknd !biz_hours_ext
> delay_access 1 allow all
> # Hard 128-256K/sec Limit per/user
> delay_parameters 1 -1/-1 -1/-1 128000/256000 128000/256000
> delay_initial_bucket_level 25
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Chad E. Naugle
> Tech Support II, x. 7981
> Travel Impressions, Ltd.
>
>
>
>>>> "J Webster" <webster_jack_at_hotmail.com> 11/9/2010 3:05 PM >>>
> This is how it looks at present.
> It seems that it might be appliued as aggregate and individual?
>
>
> Number Class Aggregate limit Individual limit Network limit
> 1 Aggregate and individual Unlimited Unlimited=20
> 2 Aggregate and individual 32000/sec, 150000 max 32000/sec, 120000
> max=20
> 3 Aggregate 64000/sec, 128000 max=20
>
> Is that 64kbps on #3? Should be enough to view video shouldn;t it?
>
>
>
> Travel Impressions made the following annotations
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient
> and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not
> the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of
> the information included in this message and any attachments is
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this
> message and any attachments.
> Thank you."
>
Received on Tue Nov 09 2010 - 20:33:01 MST