Re: [squid-users] NEWBIE: force squid to store/cache xml responses?

AJ Weber wrote:
> Right, as I said, this is a specialized case, accelerating exactly ONE
> application server (actually a few, but just load-balanced of the same
> "site"). There is no way, if my config is correct, that either another
> Squid proxy will be able to leverage mine as a peer, nor any way a user
> can use mine as a proxy to any other website. Thus, the concerns about
> any problems manifesting "downstream" aren't an issue.
>
> As for getting the app server to properly set the headers, I'm wondering
> why Tomcat isn't doing that in the first place? It's a pretty
> good/stable app server and usually serves content reliably. Could it be
> because Tomcat would be likely conforming to HTTP 1.1, not 1.0 and thus
> setting the headers differently?

not likely. possible the other way around where some controls
technically don't appear in 1.0. But have been in wide use for years anyway.

your experience of tomcat seems to differ vastly from mine.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.6
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.1