On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:14:05 -0500, "Alan Lehman" <alehman_at_gbateam.com>
wrote:
>> >> From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3_at_treenet.co.nz]
>> >> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 1:55 AM
>> >> To: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [squid-users] possible SOAP problem with 3.1.4
>> >>
>> >> Alan Lehman wrote:
>> >>> We have particular application software license server for our
>> office
>> >>> that is located behind a Squid proxy. It stopped working after
>> >> upgrading
>> >>> Squid from 3.1.0.17 to 3.1.4. This server periodically goes to the
>> >>> software company's web site to verify the license is valid and
>> upload
>> >>> user counts, etc. It appears to be some sort of SOAP application.
>> The
>> >>> license server runs on a Windows server. From access.log:
>> >>>
>> >>> Running 3.1.0.17 (succeeds) -
>> >>> 1278609155.802 470 172.16.4.43 TCP_MISS/200 725 POST
>> >>> http://selectserver.bentley.com/bss/ws/Misc.asmx -
>> >> DIRECT/64.90.235.78
>> >>> text/xml
>> >>> 1278609157.482 1054 172.16.4.43 TCP_MISS/200 117679 POST
>> >>> http://selectserver.bentley.com/bss/ws/GatewayWS.asmx -
>> >>> DIRECT/64.90.235.78 text/xml
>> >>>
>> >>> Running 3.1.4 (fails) -
>> >>> 1278607986.223 1138 172.16.4.43 TCP_MISS/500 838 POST
>> >>> http://selectserver.bentley.com/bss/ws/Misc.asmx -
>> >> DIRECT/64.90.235.78
>> >>> application/soap+xml
>> >>> 1278607987.128 895 172.16.4.43 TCP_MISS/200 1178 POST
>> >>> http://selectserver.bentley.com/bss/ws/Misc.asmx -
>> >> DIRECT/64.90.235.78
>> >>> text/xml
>> >>>
>> >>> I verified the situation by going back to 3.1.0.17 with the same
>> >> config,
>> >>> whereupon it started working again. I tried adding cache deny for
>> >> this
>> >>> domain but it didn't change anything.
>> >>>
>> >>> Any thoughts would be most appreciated.
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Alan Lehman
>> >> Don't know the problem.
>> >> You are going to have to dig into the request/reply's a bit further
>> to
>> >> see what the problems is.
>> >> The biggest difference between 3.1.0.17 and 3.1.4 is that HTTP/1.1
>> is
>> >> sent to the server by 3.1.4. It may be doing some broken magic, as
>> >> evidenced by the different response type given to Squid now.
>> >>
>> >> Amos
>> >> --
>> >> Please be using
>> >> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.5
>> >
>> >
>> > So far I'm unable to determine a consistent pattern with Wireshark.
>> Is there a way I can force 3.1.4 to use HTTP/1.0?
>> >
>> > Alan
>>
>> You can reverse the 1.1 enabling patch found here:
>> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/squid-3.1-
>> 9916.patch
>>
>> Amos
>> --
>> Please be using
>> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.5
>
>
> Using Wireshark, I recorded the following conversation between the
license
> server and Squid-3.1.6. The capture with the patched version of squid is
> very similar. It appears to me that the license server is not responding
> correctly to Squid's 417, right? But why is Squid 3.1.6 (unpatched)
> issuing the 417?
Um, this is a little strange. The *server* is making these requests
through Squid?
The client-server model indicates the machine you are calling a server
here is in fact a client.
So, the workaround is to turn on the ignore_expect100 directive in Squid.
Which suppresses the 417 response going to clients.
>
> POST http://selectserver.bentley.com/bss/ws/GatewayWS.asmx HTTP/1.1
> User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; MS Web Services Client
> Protocol 2.0.50727.3603)
> Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
> SOAPAction:
"http://bentley.com/selectserver/webservices/GetGatewayLicense"
> Host: selectserver.bentley.com
> Content-Length: 564
> Expect: 100-continue
> Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
>
> HTTP/1.0 417 Expectation Failed
> Server: squid/3.1.6
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:40:31 GMT
> Content-Type: text/html
> Content-Length: 3944
> X-Squid-Error: ERR_INVALID_REQ 0
> Vary: Accept-Language
> Content-Language: en
> X-Cache: MISS from proxy2.gbateam.com
> Via: 1.0 proxy2.gbateam.com (squid/3.1.6)
> Proxy-Connection: close
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
> <html><head>....
> </body></html>
So far so good.
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><soap:Envelope
> xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><soap:Body><GetGatewayLicense
>
xmlns="http://bentley.com/selectserver/webservices/"><GatewayKey>062D0432571D1748859E50B1CD98B9DE</GatewayKey><GatewaySiteKeys><string>062D0432571D1748859E50B1CD98B9DE</string></GatewaySiteKeys><ComputerName>SUP1</ComputerName><SSHostName>selectserver.bentley.com</SSHostName></GetGatewayLicense></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
>
Um, Where is that garbage coming from? The POST?
Assuming so, that would make the client broken and maybe a bug in Squid
lettign that brokenness through.
This type of behaviour is what the ignore_expect100 can help with. Making
Squid suppress the 417 to the client and drop any 100 is receives from the
server. Passing the request on as if it was a regular POST with body
directly after .
> POST http://selectserver.bentley.com/bss/ws/usagelogging.asmx HTTP/1.0
> User-Agent: BSIlm/0.9.0.0
> Host: selectserver.bentley.com
> Content-Length: 0
> Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
> Pragma: no-cache
>
> HTTP/1.0 500 Internal Server Error
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:40:33 GMT
> Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
> X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
> X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
> Cache-Control: private
> Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset=utf-8
> Content-Length: 481
> X-Cache: MISS from proxy2.gbateam.com
> Via: 1.0 proxy2.gbateam.com (squid/3.1.6)
> Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Weird.
<snip server reply body>
>
> POST http://selectserver.bentley.com/bss/ws/usagelogging.asmx HTTP/1.0
> User-Agent: BSIlm/0.9.0.0
> Host: selectserver.bentley.com
> Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8
> Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
> Pragma: no-cache
> Content-Length: 8153
> SOAPAction:
> "http://bentley.com/selectserver/webservices/ReportUsageEntries"
>
> <soap:Envelope.... ></soap:Envelope>
>
> HTTP/1.0 200 OK
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:40:43 GMT
> Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
> X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
> X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
> Cache-Control: private, max-age=0
> Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
> Content-Length: 715
> X-Cache: MISS from proxy2.gbateam.com
> Via: 1.0 proxy2.gbateam.com (squid/3.1.6)
> Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><soap:Envelope
> xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><soap:Body><ReportUsageEntriesResponse
>
xmlns="http://bentley.com/selectserver/webservices/"><ReportUsageEntriesResult><Status>0</Status><LicenseAvaliable>1</LicenseAvaliable><ProductName>MicroStation</ProductName><Ack>MHd0oUWqXDp3tB89iGrAbXpR63A=</Ack><CompanyName>George
> Butler &
>
Associates</CompanyName><SiteID>4012052</SiteID><SelectServerSerialNumber>70000661800020</SelectServerSerialNumber><LicType>1</LicType></ReportUsageEntriesResult></ReportUsageEntriesResponse></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
>
Client then tries again without the Expect:. This is good behaviour
finally and it seems to work.
> POST http://selectserver.bentley.com/bss/ws/usagelogging.asmx HTTP/1.0
> User-Agent: BSIlm/0.9.0.0
> Host: selectserver.bentley.com
> Content-Length: 0
> Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
> Pragma: no-cache
>
> HTTP/1.0 500 Internal Server Error
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:40:44 GMT
> Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
> X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
> X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
> Cache-Control: private
> Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset=utf-8
> Content-Length: 481
> X-Cache: MISS from proxy2.gbateam.com
> Via: 1.0 proxy2.gbateam.com (squid/3.1.6)
> Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
>
Back to the weirdness with no apparent reason.
Amos
Received on Tue Aug 10 2010 - 23:47:59 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 12 2010 - 12:00:03 MDT