Re: [squid-users] c-icap vs Havp

Thank you very much

Matus UHLAR

and Henrik

Henrik K wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:39:07AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> On 24.06.10 10:05, senthilkumaar2021 wrote:
>>
>>> In order to use Anti virus scanning with Squid proxy which one is
>>> suitable whether C-ICAP with ClamAV or HAVP with ClamAv.We are having
>>> request rate around 300-350 re/sec.Which one will handle more requests
>>> with ease?We have made some basic tests and it seems c-icap will handle
>>> more requests.
>>>
>> then it's apparently true. and I found that more feasdible than using any
>> kind of parent caches for squid
>>
>
> HAVP is not very optimized in it's architecture, sadly no one has time to
> improve it. ICAP certainly is the easier choice and more manageable for such
> rates. For lesser rates HAVP does have it's advantages.
>
> http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/201003/0400.html
>
>
>
Received on Thu Jun 24 2010 - 09:01:22 MDT