Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Some factums worth knowing:
>
> * 3.0 does not support sslBump or any other form of HTTPS
> man-in-middle attacks. 3.1 is required for that.
>
> * sslBump in 3.1 requires that the client machines all have a CA
> certificate installed to make them trust the proxy for decryption.
>
> * sslBump requires clients to be configured for using the proxy.
> (Some of the 'transparent' above work this way some do not.)
>
> Amos
Hi Amos. What is the vantage of use sslBump if I cannot use a
transparent proxy with it? Is the ability to cache SSL content?
Tks in advance.
Received on Wed Mar 24 2010 - 12:29:51 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Mar 24 2010 - 12:00:06 MDT