Re: [squid-users] Squid cache_dir failed - can squid survive?

From: Ivan . <ivanhec_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:14:40 +1100

I noticed an improvement when I disabled it, which may have something
to do with my cache settings, but I tried a number of config combos
without much success

2010/3/18 Henrik Nordström <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>:
> tor 2010-03-18 klockan 17:25 +1100 skrev Ivan .:
>> I wonder about the value of http cache, when the majority of high
>> volume sites used in the corporate environment are dynamic.
>> http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/
>
> Hit ratio have not declined that much in the last decade. It's still
> around 25-30% byte hit ratio and significantly more in request hit
> ratio.
>
> While it's true that a lot of the html content is more dynamic than
> before there is also lots more inlined content such as images etc which
> are plain static and caches just fine and these make up for the majority
> of the traffic.
>
>> How is the no-cache HTTP header handled by Squid?
>
> By default as if the response is not cachable. Somewhat stricter than
> the specifications require, but more in line with what web authors
> expect when using this directive.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 18 2010 - 11:14:48 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 18 2010 - 12:00:04 MDT