Michael Bowe wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3_at_treenet.co.nz]
>
> Hi Amos
>
>
>> If you get 4+ core hardware, a CARP model with one instance receiving
>> all requests and balancing across the other cores for actual storage
>> handling with 1+ disk per core scales extremely well.
>
> I'll go read up on CARP
>
> I wonder whether CARP + TPROXY would play together nicely though?
Good point.
Have not tried it but I expect they are able to work together. TPROXY in
3.1 works between peers.
It would just require some additional routing tricks to force packets
from the LB instance to go through a public interface and be
double-TPROXY'd on their way to the back-end. Avoiding use of the lo
interface which can't be bound to remote IPs.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE20 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.15Received on Thu Dec 17 2009 - 05:21:56 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 17 2009 - 12:00:02 MST