Re: [squid-users] Re: ubuntu apt-get update 404

Matthew Morgan wrote:
> Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Matthew Morgan wrote:
<snip>
>>> Ok, it seems to happen in stages. The first time I run apt-get
>>> update after switching to 3.x, it's hit or miss. Sometimes it's
>>> perfect, sometimes I get errors. After that, I get errors in two
>>> stages. Here's what happens:
>>>
>>>
>>> Either:
>>>
>>> apt-get update #1 - no errors
>>> apt-get update #2 - invalid header, and sometimes 404 errors
>>> apt-get update #3 and above - 404 errors only
>>>
>>> or:
>>>
>>> apt-get update #1 - invalid header, and sometimes 404 errors
>>> apt-get update #2 and above - 404 errors only
>>>
>>> The dump files I have uploaded match the second set of
>>> circumstances. server1.dump and client1.dump are from the first
>>> apt-get update after switching, and I got an invalid header error +
>>> 404 errors. server2.dump and client2.dump came from the second
>>> apt-get update attempt, and only 404 errors were returned.
>>>
>>> I hope this helps! Let me know if you need anything else. Just a
>>> reminder, on my setup I only have 1 squid server with 1 cache
>>> directory. For comparison, my server is Ubuntu 9.04 running kernel
>>> 2.6.28-16-server. I am not using TPROXY.
>>>
>>> Here are the files (I tried to attach them, but mailer-daemon kicked
>>> the email)
>>>
>>> http://lithagen.dyndns.org/server1.dump
>>> http://lithagen.dyndns.org/client1.dump
>>> http://lithagen.dyndns.org/server2.dump
>>> http://lithagen.dyndns.org/client2.dump
>>
>> Well, good news and sad news.
>>
>> Both traces show the same problems.
>>
>> The 404 is actually being generated by the us.archive.ubuntu.com
>> server itself. There is something broken at the mirror or in apts
>> local sources.list URLs.
> So does squid 3.x have a different user agent string or something?

No.

> Everything works fine with the exact same sources.list when using squid
> 2.7, so there shouldn't be anything wrong with the file.
> us.archive.ubuntu.com must be treating squid 3.x different somehow, right?

It does seem to be. Why is the big question.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE20
   Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.14