Vivek wrote:
> Amos,
> 
> Thanks for your reply.
> 
> I am using 300GB for caching ( aufs ) and 16GB of RAM. If the connection 
> loss is a normal one, i will reconsider the way i rotate files.
> 
Hmmm, so 316 GB cache indexed is I guess somewhere up around 3GB of 
journal file being calculated and written on each hourly rotate.
Yes I would expect a few seconds lag. Easily enough to explain a 
temporarily lost WCCP exchange.
Amos
> 
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
> Vivek
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
> 
> To: Vivek <viveksnv_at_aol.in>
> 
> Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
> 
> Sent: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 1:27 pm
> 
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] wccp service lost issue
> 
> 
> 
> Vivek wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Amos,
> 
>>
> 
>> I didn't see any errors related to squid restart/crash in cache.log. 
> Is
> 
>> there any way to debug this ?
> 
>>
> 
> Other than dumping the WCCP info display on the router I have no idea.
> 
> 
> 
> As Adrian said, its probably just a temporary issue with a long index
> 
> rebuild causing Squid to ignore one of the WCCP announcements.
> 
> 
> 
> If so the loss time will remain the same no matter how frequently or
> 
> infrequently you rotate. Thus less often will be less outage time.
> 
> 
> 
> Amos
> 
> -- 
> 
> Please be using
> 
>  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE18
> 
>  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.13
> ________________________________________________________________________
> You are invited to Get a Free AOL Email ID. - http://webmail.aol.in
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE18 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.13Received on Mon Aug 24 2009 - 10:38:10 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 24 2009 - 12:00:04 MDT