Re: [squid-users] Question on changing from ufs to aufs+coss

From: Pandu E Poluan <pandu_poluan_at_paninsekuritas.co.id>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:20:22 +0700

I see.

About "different disks", must this be different physical disks or
different partition is sufficient?

Rgds,

[p]

Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 27.04.09 16:41, Pandu E Poluan wrote:
>
>> Ah, thanks for the explanation.
>>
>> One thing is still unclear for me, though: Why is it not a good idea to
>> have 2+ cache on same disk?
>>
>> In my understanding (CMIIW), aufs is better for larger objects while
>> coss is better for smaller objects (or the other way around).
>>
>
> Yes, but if you have enough of disk space, you can put those on different
> disks. This rule mostly applied to two cache_dirs of type *ufs/diskd in
> which case it's useless and can slow squid down.
>

-- 
*Pandu E Poluan*
*Panin Sekuritas*
IT Manager / Infrastructure & Audit
Phone : 	+62-21-515-3055 ext 135
Fax : 	+62-21-515-3061
Mobile : 	+62-856-8400-426
e-mail : 	pandu_poluan_at_paninsekuritas.co.id 
<mailto:pandu_poluan_at_paninsekuritas.co.id>
	
	
	
	
Y!M : 	hands0me_irc
MSN : 	si-ganteng_at_live.com
GTalk : 	pandu.cakep_at_gmail.com
Received on Tue Apr 28 2009 - 05:23:23 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 29 2009 - 12:00:02 MDT