On 23.12.08 03:55, Nyamul Hassan wrote:
> I've gone through the research documents referred to in the squid config
> file, that compares the performance between different
> cache_replacement_policy. However, both of them appear to be almost 10
> years old!
>
> Given that time, has there been any updates to the internal codes of these
> replacement policies that could change the results if those tests were done
> today?
I don't think so. The issue lies in algorithms, and heap algorithms are
still more effective than old LRU :)
I doubt the situatuion will change before any massive change in computer
technologies, probably related to paralellism, at which time squid will be
much different, if any :)
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Your mouse has moved. Windows NT will now restart for changes to take to take effect. [OK]Received on Tue Dec 23 2008 - 07:38:54 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 23 2008 - 12:00:02 MST