Re: [squid-users] Class 4 Delay pools

Johnny Edge wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I have a NT Group based acl Squid setup. Everything is fine with it, except for I'd like to provide certain NT Security Groups with more bandwidth than others, i.e. allocate bw by username/groupname.
> Atm the traffic control is done on a iproute2/tc basis which is not sufficient for my needs.
>
> Is this possible and how?

Yes. Probably using delay_access.

> I can't find decent info on Class 4 dalay pools usage.

A Class 4 pool works on a per-authentication (username) basis. Any
given username is given a bucket/pool (possibly further restricted by
the individual, network and/or aggregate buckets), no matter how many
IPs their traffic is going to. A class 5 pool, coupled with an external
ACL that returns tags according to group membership would allow you to
have per-group pools (again possibly further limited by the other
buckets), not really what you seem to be looking for. Your best bet is
to read a bit more about delay_access and use that to push specific
group members in to specific Class 1, 2 or 3 pools (depending on if/how
you want to further allocate bandwidth within the pool).

For documentation, recently I've been pointing people at
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/, but the section in there on
delay_class is not very comprehensive and the section dealing with
delay_parameters makes no mention of the fact that Class 4 and Class 5
pools are only available in Squid 3. Upon further inspection, there are
links to the version specific information, so it's still a good place to
start. See http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/delay_access/,
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/delay_class/ and
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/delay_parameters/ with a dash of
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/external_acl_type/.

> Please advise.
>

Hope that's advice and not chaos... Here's a bonus section with pseudo
ACLs to help illustrate what I'm referring to:

acl FastUsers NTLMGroup matches ServerAdmins
acl RegularUsers NTLMGroup matches LoggedInUsers # Yes, the FastUsers
would also be part of this group
acl SlowUsers NTLMGroup matches Guests # Should match all other
computers that are allowed access

# Now I'll give two examples using the above ACLs
# First, the ServerAdmins are given limited bandwidth (but less limited
than everyone else)
# and guests are even more limited...

# Allocate three pools
delay_pools 3
# All of type 1
delay_class 1 1
delay_class 2 1
delay_class 3 1
# Set up the ServerAdmin's pool
delay_parameters 1 32000/32000
# Next the users' pool
delay_parameters 2 16000/16000
# Finally the guest pool
delay_parameters 3 8000/8000
# Now we assign users to their respective pools
delay_access 1 allow FastUsers
delay_access 1 deny all
delay_access 2 allow RegularUsers # ServerAdmins have already matched pool 1
delay_access 2 deny all
delay_access 3 allow all

# Example 2, ServerAdmins are not limited. Everyone else is put into a
class 3 pool.
delay_pools 1
delay_class 1 3
# 256kbit/s pool limit, no "network" limit, 16kbit/s individual bucket
# Fun fact: Class 2 pools allow an individual bucket to match only the
last octet while
# class 3 has a separate bucket for every combination of third and
fourth octet
# (according to the documentation from Squid 2.6*).
delay_parameters 1 32000/32000 -1/-1 2000/2000
delay_access 1 deny FastUsers
delay_access allow all

> Thanks,
>
> -JE
>

Chris

* In other words, given a class 2 delay pool, 10.0.0.10 and 10.0.1.10
would share an individual bucket, but would each have their own
individual bucket in a class 3 pool. I haven't read the source code (or
tested my theory on a real install), so the documentation
(http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.6/cfgman/delay_class.html)
might be wrong. I also might be mis-interpreting what the documentation
conveys. Then again, maybe this code has been significantly changed
since 2.6.
Received on Tue Dec 16 2008 - 00:53:11 MST