>
> In my case all of the data being sent out was small enough and
> repetitive enough to be in the Linux filesystem cache. That's where I
> found the best throughput. I think the typical size of the data items
> were about 8-30MBytes. It was a regular Linux ext3 filesystem. The
> machine happens to have been a dual dual-core 64-bit 2Ghz Opteron,
> although I saw some Intel machines with similar performance per CPU but
> on those I had only one gigabit network interface and one squid.
>
I see, You've got really big files to serve, so it's easier to get those
numbers in throughput. I wonder if it's possible get such a number with
smaller files 1kB - 50kB for example.
cheers
-- Marcin MazurekReceived on Mon Oct 06 2008 - 20:50:07 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 07 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT