> Is it true that there are problems with Cache_dir more than 10GB?
No. I have larger caches here. Some others have caches in the TB range.
Only "cache_dir coss" specifically are known to have maximum size issues
due to the format design. And not handle large files.
There are some related issues known;
You might need Squid built with --enable-large-files to get a 64-bit
build if you intend to pass entire DVDs through Squid.
Squid-2 has issues with handling of very large individual files being
somewhat slow.
>
> Many people talk about it, but I dont found any information in Squid
> website. May be I didnt looking for right!
>
> So, it is true, will be a big problem, because with big hd, more than
> 100GB, all to make cache. We will have problem with speed of write and
> read in one HD.
AUFS on Linux, or DiskD on *BSD should have no problem with that size.
Just make sure there is enough RAM in use for a mem-cache and the file
indexes.
Amos
Received on Tue Sep 30 2008 - 03:36:59 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 30 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT