On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Besides whatever changes are in the release notes, I think you'll be fine.
> I tried reasonably hard to make 2.6 -> 2.7 a seamless update; the only
> surprises could be the storeUpdate stuff which Henrik included near the
> end of the development cycle. That can be turned off to fall back to
> the Squid-2.6 behaviour.
>
>
Thanks Adrian.
I see that there is an option to specify the number of threads for aufs.
What is the optimum number of threads / what is the default number that
squid uses?? can it be altered to have effect on squid performance??
Thanks
Manoj
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008, Manoj_Rajkarnikar wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Any special point to note when upgrading from 2.6S19 to 2.7S2. I searched
>> for any clues but found none. just tying to confirm. our cache is serving
>> ~40% of our internet bandwidth and everything would go haywire if it goes
>> down during upgrade.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Manoj
>> --
>
>
--Received on Sun Jun 29 2008 - 05:59:15 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 29 2008 - 12:00:06 MDT