Re: [squid-users] Searching squid logs for pornographic sites

Rob Asher disse na ultima mensagem:

>
>>>> "Michel (M)" <michel_at_lucenet.com.br> 6/12/2008 6:59 AM >>>
>
>
>> but at the end this entire search might be useless since there is no
>> guaranty that www.mynewbabyisborn.org is no porn and that www.butt.com
>> is
>> porn, or how do you catch www.m-y.d-i.c-k.a.t.microsoft.com ?
>> I abandoned all this keyword_stuff_searching long time ago because even
>> if
>> it would work the user still could use a fantasyproxy somewhere on port
>> 42779 or a vpn as hamachi and then you do what?
>>
>> michel
>> ...
>
> I agree too but until there's a better way, we'll still use the keyword
> searching to find the blatant sites. In our case, we're blocking egress
> traffic for everything except known services(our own proxies) so anonymous
> proxies and vpn's won't be able to connect....UNLESS they can get to them
> through the proxies somehow. Things like PHProxy and all the anonymizing
> sites make it tougher. There's ways around anything I know but we adapt
> and keep plugging away.
>

sure, if you need it you need it ...
we offer the inverse approach to our costumers, we block all but the sites
the user allows, so the parents decide which sites the kids can go to and
everything else is blocked

michel
...

****************************************************
Tecnologia Internet Matik http://info.matik.com.br
Sistemas Wireless para o Provedor Banda Larga
Hospedagem e Email personalizado - e claro, no Brasil.
****************************************************
Received on Thu Jun 12 2008 - 14:27:07 MDT