Re: [squid-users] Marking Cached traffic..

Excellent news.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
To: "Manoj_Rajkarnikar" <manoj@vianet.com.np>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Marking Cached traffic..

> Manoj_Rajkarnikar wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Stephan Viljoen wrote:
>>>> HI There,
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering whether it's posible to mark cached traffic with a
>>>> different TOS then uncached traffic. I need to come up with a way of
>>>> passing cached traffic through our bandwidth manager without taxing the
>>>> end
>>>> user for it. Basically giving them the full benefits of the proxy
>>>> server.
>>>
>>> There's the http://zph.bratcheda.org/ stuff.
>>
>> We've been using this one since the 2.5 days and is doing the job pretty
>> well. Seems quite stable. We're currently using 2.6S19.
>>
>>>
>>> I'm probably going to roll it into my private tree after I've stabilised
>>> the codebase. Someone's asked me about it.
>>>
>>
>> will we be seeing it in the mainline tree some time in the future ??
>>
>
> I've contacted the author about getting it into 3.1 or 3.2.
>
>
> Amos
> --
> Please use Squid 2.6.STABLE19 or 3.0.STABLE4
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.