* Marcus Kool <marcus.kool@urlfilterdb.com>:
>>> I can confirm that. We switched from 2.6 -> 3.0 with no hassle (at 100
>>> requests/s)
>>>
>>
>> I had Adrian benchmark 3.x recently. With his specific RAM-pathways test.
>>
>> The cutoff for speed seems to be Squid3 reaching 500-650 req/sec and
>> Squid 2.6 going past that into the 800-900 req/sec ranges. At a few
>> hundred concurrent requests.
> >
>> Amos
>
> Do these limits depend on hardware ?
Probably :) Otherwise we'd still use our dinky c64.
> if yes, what is the hardware that was used to find these limits ?
My box:
# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 2076656 kB
# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/cciss/c0d0p5 13G 9.0G 3.8G 71% /
tmpfs 1014M 0 1014M 0% /lib/init/rw
tmpfs 1014M 4.0K 1014M 1% /dev/shm
/dev/cciss/c0d0p8 17G 15G 1.2G 93% /squid-cache0
/dev/cciss/c0d0p9 17G 15G 1.3G 93% /squid-cache1
/dev/cciss/c0d0p10 18G 12G 4.6G 73% /squid-data
-- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-962 IT-Zentrum Standort CBF send no mail to plonk@charite.deReceived on Tue Jan 29 2008 - 02:32:48 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 12:00:05 MST