Re: [squid-users] Opinions on Setup...

Andy,

   you're setup looks plausible, i have little experience with carp (i
use them for firewalls and the fw' sessions get sync pretty well on
both machines) my only question would how will carp be able to tell
the sessions initiated/managed by squid? all of them will come in
through port 3128 right? and carp will just sync that on the other
box. once the query is processed it's being handled entirely by squid,
But I might be wrong as well.

anyways, I would recommend to just do DNS round-robin on both squid boxes.

my .2cents
-beavis

On Jan 9, 2008 9:20 AM, Andy McCall <Andy.McCall@unitypartnership.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> A few weeks ago I posted a message on this list about setting up two squid-caching-only servers for two WebMarshal content-checking-only servers for around 120 school. I was pointed in the general direction by Amos and I have finally come to a configuration that may work and was hoping for some input.
>
> The squid servers will be on the same network, and running RedHat Linux Enterprise 5. I was then going to configure two CARP interfaces on them, e.g. 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. A single DNS entry for squid-proxy.domain.gov.uk will point to 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2 and the squid cache's will be set up as cache_peer's of each other.
>
> Can anyone think of any issues I will have with this set up, or can anyone think of anything else that will help my setup?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy McCall
> Senior Technical Officer
> --
> ICT & Printing, The Unity Partnership...
> ...working with Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
> Civic Centre
> West Street
> Oldham
> OL1 1UU
> --
> Telephone: 0161 770 8814
> Fax: 0161770 3998
> Email: andy.mccall@unitypartnership.com
> --
>
> **********************************************************************
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
> is unauthorised. If you have received it in error, please notify us immediately
> by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your system.
>
> This note confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of
> computer viruses, however we advise that in keeping with good IT practice the
> recipient should ensure that the e-mail together with any attachments are virus
> free by running a virus scan themselves. We cannot accept any responsibility for
> any damage or loss caused by software viruses.
>
> The Unity Partnership Ltd, registered in England at West Hall, Parvis Road, West Byfleet, Surrey UK KT14 6EZ.
> Registered No : 5916336. VAT No : 903761336.
> **********************************************************************
>
Received on Thu Jan 10 2008 - 18:42:56 MST