Hi Amos,
Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Is there such a thing as too much disk cache? Presumably squid has to
>> have some way of checking this cache, and at some point it takes longer
>> to look for a cached page than to serve it direct. At what point do you
>> hit that sort of problem, or is it so large no human mind should worry?
>> :)
>>
>> Paul
>> IT Systems Admin
> 
> Disk cache is limited by access time and ironically RAM.
> 
> Squid holds an in-memory index of 10MB-ram per GB-disk. With large disk
> caches this can fill RAM pretty fast, particularly if the cache is full of
> small objects. Large objects use less index space more disk.
> 
> Some with smaller systems hit the limit at 20-100GB, others in cache farms
> reach TB.
> 
> As for the speed of lookup vs DIRECT. If anyone has stats, please let us
> know.
I can't understand under what circumstances the cache Lookup will be 
slower than DIRECT lookup unless one has a net connection faster than 
the disks!
For a 20 GB cache with 1175539 on-disk objects:
Median Service Times (seconds)  5 min    60 min:
         HTTP Requests (All):   1.24267  1.38447
         Cache Misses:          1.54242  1.71839
         Cache Hits:            0.00919  0.00865
         Near Hits:             1.38447  1.62803
         Not-Modified Replies:  0.00179  0.00091
         DNS Lookups:           0.04237  0.04433
         ICP Queries:           0.00102  0.00096
The cache Lookup is 170 times faster than DIRECT lookups!
MAYBE, if I use a bigger cache say, 100-300 GB, the results could be 
different. But I believe that running multiple Squid boxes with smaller 
caches (10-30 GB) is always better than running 1 single Squid box with 
a (100-300 GB) cache.
The benefits of running multiple smaller caches far outweigh running a 
single large cache.
But this is only my opinion.
 From my guess and experience, to run a 300 GB cache, one needs about 6 
GB of memory! But I can't imagine how to manage a 300 GB cache if it 
gets corrupted!
Thanking you...
> 
> Amos
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu System Administrator (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal http://www.wlink.com.np http://teklimbu.wordpress.comReceived on Tue Nov 06 2007 - 02:07:36 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:00:01 MST