sön 2007-06-17 klockan 13:12 -0300 skrev Michel Santos:
> you say so but diff counts 111+/90- on store_dir_diskd.c and 50+/22- on
> store_io_diskd.c between 2.5.S14-20060721 and 2.6.S13 but "not much" is
> pretty relative
In the area of how swap.state is maintained.
> > Should not happen, and have not heard of it happening from anyone else.
>
> first part I agree but hum :)
> I am not sure if this means not true until someone else calls it or not
> true coming from me ... either way, strange answer, does it mean you don't
> care and I'm on my own with this?
It means it's the first time we have heard of this problem.
And yes, I don't care much for diskd. Never have. My main focus is on
aufs and ufs. But how swap.state is maintained should be the same in all
three "ufs" based cache_dir types. And with current FreeBSDs also fully
capable of using aufs...
Regards
Henrik
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 12:00:04 MDT